Post on 28-Mar-2015
March /2006
Jerson KelmanDirector-GeneralANEEL
ELECTRIC SECTOR FRAMEWORK
ELECTRIC SECTOR FRAMEWORK
Platts 10th Brazil Energy Conference
2
João Pessoa
Jacui
Porto Alegre
Florianópolis
Curitiba
São Paulo
Rio de Janeiro
Paraíbado Sul
Uruguai
Vitória
BeloHorizonte
Itaipu
Grande
Paranaíba
Paraná/Tietê
Campo Grande
Iguaçu
Tocantins
Belém
São Francisco
Parnaíba
São Luís
Teresina
Fortaleza
Natal
Recife
Maceió
Aracajú
SalvadorCuiabá
Goiânia
Brasília
Paranapanema
Argentina
Installed Cap. = 92,865 MW• Hydroelectric = 71,060 MW - 76.5 %• Thermal = 19,798 MW - 21.3 %• Nuclear = 2,007 MW - 2.2 %
Consumption Units = 56.3 million Energy Production = 335,4 TWh/y (55% of South America) Peak Load = 60,910 MW (United Kingdom or Italy)
HV Transmission Lines = 84,512 km
Source: MME/ANEEL (Jan 2006)
Generation: 2000 plants 10 largest companies account for 70% of the installed capacity; 3 of them are private Altogether, of the installed capacity…
15% private Transmission: 26 utilities
60% private Distribution: 64 utilities
80% private
Brazilian Electricity SystemBrazilian Electricity System
3
Brazilian Electricity Mix (TWh) 2005
Source: MME / BEN 2005 / EPE
4
Percentage of potential hydroelectric in operation
100
83
64 61 6055
4537
21 18 1611 6 4 1
24
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
France
Ger
man
y
Japan
Norway
USA
Switzla
ndIta
ly
Canad
a
BRAZILIn
dia
Colom
bia
China
Russia
Peru
Indon
esia
Congo
5
Short term marginal cost – spot price (US$ / MWh)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
ago/
95
nov/9
5
fev/9
6
mai/
96
ago/
96
nov/9
6
fev/9
7
mai/
97
ago/
97
nov/9
7
fev/9
8
mai/
98
ago/
98
nov/9
8
fev/9
9
mai/
99
ago/
99
nov/9
9
fev/0
0
mai/
00
ago/
00
nov/0
0
fev/0
1
mai/
01
ago/
01
nov/0
1
fev/0
2
US
$/M
Wh
In a predominantly hydro system, spot prices are usually low; when they rise, because of the drawdown of the reservoirs, it is too late for new investments
In a predominantly hydro system, spot prices are usually low; when they rise, because of the drawdown of the reservoirs, it is too late for new investments
6
2004 Power Sector Model• Motivation
– Skyrocketing energy costs
– Severe rationing in 2001-2002 (20% of the country’s energy consumption)
– 12 million people without access to electricity
• Main Features
– Introduce efficient contracting mechanisms for captive consumers
– Ensure reliable supply for all consumers (Government planning & environmental license)
– Universal access, with special tariffs for low-income consumers
– End of dealing between generators and distributors, including self-dealing; generators now bid to meet de aggregated demand of a pool of distributors
7
Existing generation
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Existing PPA’s
Demand
Old Energy
New energy(expansion projects)
Old and New Energy
8
Results of the Energy Auctions
100% 100% 100% 98,8% 94,3% 94,7%
0%10%
20%30%40%
50%60%70%80%
90%100%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Percentage of demand covered by
PPA’s
PPA’s Old energy: US$ 39.0 bi New energy: US$ 29.6 bi Total: US$ 68.7 bi
Average Price (US$/MWh)
41.27 36.14
32.81 29.27 25.00
50.92 55.55 55.28
-
10
20
30
40
50
60
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Beginning of Supply
US$
/MW
h
Old Energy New Energy
9
Generation
Free Consumers
Captive Consumers
Free Consumers
DistributionTransmission
Distribution Distribution Tariff Tariff
Financial flux
TUSTTUST TUSD TUSD
TUSD - TUSD - Distribution network charge + taxes
TUST – Distribution network charge + taxesDistribution Tariff = Energy + TUSDDistribution Tariff = Energy + TUSD
PPA – Power Purchase Agreement
TUSTTUST
TUSTTUST
PPA (energy)
PPA (energy)
10
Distribution tariffs (1/6)
Who pays?
Service Revenue
B3B3
Taxes
TETE
((energy)energy)
Infrastructure
Distribution network Distribution network chargecharge
B2B2 B4B4B1B1A4A4A3A3A2A2
captive consumerscaptive consumers
A3A3
Distribution network Distribution network chargecharge
A4A4A2A2
Free consumersFree consumers
TaxesInfrastructure
11
Annual adjustmentAnnual adjustmentof the tariffsof the tariffs
Periodic revision Periodic revision of the tariffsof the tariffs
Signature Signature of the contractof the contract
Distribution tariffs (2/6)
Annual Adjustment & Periodic Revision
1999 2000 2001 2002 20042003
Extraordinary revision Extraordinary revision of the tariffsof the tariffs
12
RS = Pass-through Costs + Controllable Costs
Distribution tariffs (3/6)
Composition
Energy Purchase
+
Transmission Cost
+
Public Charges
O&M+
Investors’ Payment+
Assets Depreciation
13
Controllable CostsControllable Costs
x
Investors´ Payment ($)Reintegration of depreciation
Expenses ($)+
Net Asset-baseNet Asset-base valuevalue
Net Asset-baseNet Asset-base valuevalue
Rate ofRate ofreturnreturn
Rate ofRate ofreturnreturn
O&M Costs ($)+
xGrossGross
Asset-baseAsset-baseValueValue
GrossGrossAsset-baseAsset-base
ValueValue
DepreciationDepreciationRateRate
DepreciationDepreciationRateRate
ReferenceReferenceFirm Firm
ReferenceReferenceFirm Firm
Distribution tariffs (4/6)
Controllable costs
14
Distribution tariffs (5/6)
Gross Asset Value
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
% Gross/IPCA Medium IPCA = 103.24% % Gross/IGPM Medium IGPM = 79.86%
Brazilian Index: IGP-M = General Market Price Index IPCA = Broad Consumer Price Index
15
Distribution tariffs (6/6)
Net Asset Value
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
%Net/IPCA s/ ADM Medium IPCA = 89.13% %Net/IGPM s/ ADM Medium IGPM = 68.07%
Brazilian Index: IGP-M = General Market Price Index IPCA = Broad Consumer Price Index
16
Generation
Distribution 26,43%
Public Charges & Taxes
34,00%
Transmission 7,80%
Electricity Rate Composition
31,77%
17
0.00
50.00
100.00
150.00
200.00
250.00
300.00
350.00
400.00
450.00
Tariff of domestic consumersR
$/M
Wh
November 29, 2005
18
Which institution is in charge? (1/2)
Policy
• Congress• National Council of Energy Policy – CNPE
Long Term Planning (supply and demand balance)
• Ministry of Mines and Energy – MME
• Energy Research Company – EPE
Regulation
• Brazilian Electricity Regulatory Agency – ANEEL
19
Which institution is in charge? (2/2)
System Operation
• National Operator of the Power System – ONS
Monitoring and coordination
• Electric Sector Monitoring Committee – CMSE
Accounting and clearing• Chamber of Commercialization of Electric Power
– CCEE
20
• Independent decision-making by the Board in public meetings
• Administrative autonomy
• Board members are approved by the Senate and have mandates
• Responsibilities:
Legislative: regulation (rules)
Judiciary: settling disputes
Executive: technical and economical auditing, authorizations &
auctions (by delegation)
ANEEL
21
ANEEL’s equilibrium
ANEELANEEL
• Reasonable tariffs • Quality of service• Guarantee of rights
• Reasonable tariffs • Quality of service• Guarantee of rights
• Adequate remuneration• Contracts honored• Predictable and clear rules
• Adequate remuneration• Contracts honored• Predictable and clear rules
• Access to all• Inflation control• Access to all• Inflation control
Consumers
Government Agents
22
ANNEL’s challenges
• Achieve administrative autonomy
• Maintain technically capable staff (presently underpaid)
• Improve regulation methodology based on the
first cycle of tariff reviews
• Establish a better connection between quality
of service and cost
(consumer’s desire X ability to pay)
23
• Legal, institutional and macroeconomic stability
• Environmental Licensing
• Regulatory stability
Remaining risks of investments in infrastructure
Thank you !
www.aneel.gov.br
Phone: (+55) 61 2192-8603
Fax: (+55) 61 2192-8711
institucional@aneel.gov.br