Understanding Research Impact
Cristina Rumbaitis del RioRegional Programme Manager, Action on Climate Today
March 9, 2016
This is what we usually mean….
A story of Science Impact
Source: http://www.rachelcarson.org/TimelineJS.aspx
Lessons:• 28 years from first research
evidence to (partial) action• It required moving out of science
and into journalism and advocacy / activism• Rachel Carson (and others) were
vilified in the process.
What now?
More recent lessons research impact• Time horizon for moving from research to action are compressing• We have better understanding of how people and organizations learn & make
decisions• Engaging hearts and minds• Selecttive use of evidence / bias• Learn from failure as well as successes; • Greater focus on the “user” “demand-side”; Rapid prototyping & user-oriented design• Understanding incentives and disincentives, preferences throughout the system
• Mass media, open data sharing is often a factor• Often there is a shift in “ownership” of the issue from research to journalism /
advocacy/ activism /politics• This is easier in some fields (e.g. health) more than others.
Lessons from Action on Climate Today (and beyond) • Technical inputs ≠ reports• Governments looking for ideas, safe experimentation, validation
& appreciation• Quality, consistency of engagement & trust matter• Competition can be a motivator for action (as long as it doesn’t
erode trust)• Engaging political level can accelerate change, but you need to
proceed carefully, with clear eyed understanding of incentives, alignment and misalignments.
• Engagement above and below (senior and junior levels)• Patience & persistence, change is often quite incremental.• Enduring partnerships for sustainability
Thank you!
Top Related