Rodovias 2012

10
1 PESQUISA CNT DE RODOVIAS 2012 PRINCIPAIS DADOS OBJETIVOS ;$YDOLDU DV URGRYLDV EUDVLOHLUDV SDYLPHQWDGDV LGHQWLoFDQGR DV FRQGL·ÅHV HP UHOD·µR DR SDYLPHQWR ² VLQDOL]D·µR H ² JHRPHWULD YL±ULD ;,GHQWLoFDU DV GHoFLºQFLDV UHJLVWUDU RV SRQWRV FU¼WLFRV H HODERUDU D FODVVLoFD·µR GD VLWXD·µR SRU WLSR GH JHVWµR SÆEOLFD H FRQFHGLGD SRU URGRYLD IHGHUDO SRU URGRYLD HVWDGXDO H SRU FRUUHGRU URGRYL±ULR ;$YDOLDU WDPE¸P DV FRQGL·ÅHV GDV URGRYLDV SRU 8QLGDGH GD )HGHUD·µR H SRU UHJLµR DADOS GERAIS ;(VWD ¸ D HGL·µR 1D SULPHLUD HP IRUDP DQDOLVDGRV NP ;([WHQVµR SHVTXLVDGD HP NP ;1HVWD ÆOWLPD HGL·µR KRXYH XP DFU¸VFLPR GH NP HP UHOD·µR DR DQR SDVVDGR ; HTXLSHV URWDV GH FROHWD H GH FKHFDJHP ; GLDV GH FROHWD HP FDPSR ;$V URGRYLDV SHVTXLVDGDV DEUDQJHP WRGD D PDOKD URGRYL±ULD IHGHUDO SDYLPHQWDGD RV SULQFLSDLV WUHFKRV GH URGRYLDV HVWDGXDLV SDYLPHQWDGDV H URGRYLDV FRQFHGLGDV ;,QIUDHVWUXWXUDV GH DSRLR FROHWDGDV SRVWRV GH DEDVWHFLPHQWR ERUUDFKDULDV FRQFHVVLRQ±ULDV H RoFLQDV PHF³QLFDV GH FDPLQKÅHV RX ÃQLEXV UHVWDXUDQWHV H ODQFKRQHWHV SRVWRV SROLFLDLV H oVFDLV HQWUH RXWURV

Transcript of Rodovias 2012

Page 1: Rodovias 2012

1PESQUISA CNT DE RODOVIAS 2012

PR

INC

IPA

IS D

AD

OS

OBJETIVOS

;$YDOLDU� DV� URGRYLDV� EUDVLOHLUDV� SDYLPHQWDGDV�� LGHQWLoFDQGR� DV� FRQGL·ÅHV� HP�UHOD·µR�DR�SDYLPHQWR��²�VLQDOL]D·µR�H�²�JHRPHWULD�YL±ULD�

;,GHQWLoFDU�DV�GHoFLºQFLDV��UHJLVWUDU�RV�SRQWRV�FU¼WLFRV�H�HODERUDU�D�FODVVLoFD·µR�GD�VLWXD·µR�SRU�WLSR�GH�JHVWµR��SÆEOLFD�H�FRQFHGLGD���SRU�URGRYLD�IHGHUDO��SRU�URGRYLD�HVWDGXDO�H�SRU�FRUUHGRU�URGRYL±ULR�

;$YDOLDU� WDPE¸P� DV� FRQGL·ÅHV� GDV� URGRYLDV� SRU� 8QLGDGH� GD� )HGHUD·µR� H� SRU�UHJLµR�

DADOS GERAIS

;(VWD�¸�D�����HGL·µR��1D�SULPHLUD��HP�������IRUDP�DQDOLVDGRV��������NP�

;([WHQVµR�SHVTXLVDGD�HP��������������NP�

;1HVWD�ÆOWLPD�HGL·µR���������KRXYH�XP�DFU¸VFLPR�GH�������NP��������HP�UHOD·µR�DR�DQR�SDVVDGR�

;���HTXLSHV�����URWDV�GH�FROHWD�H���GH�FKHFDJHP��

;���GLDV�GH�FROHWD�HP�FDPSR�

;$V�URGRYLDV�SHVTXLVDGDV�DEUDQJHP�WRGD�D�PDOKD�URGRYL±ULD�IHGHUDO�SDYLPHQWDGD��RV�SULQFLSDLV�WUHFKRV�GH�URGRYLDV�HVWDGXDLV�SDYLPHQWDGDV�H�URGRYLDV�FRQFHGLGDV�

;,QIUDHVWUXWXUDV� GH� DSRLR� FROHWDGDV�� SRVWRV� GH� DEDVWHFLPHQWR�� ERUUDFKDULDV��FRQFHVVLRQ±ULDV�H�RoFLQDV�PHF³QLFDV�GH�FDPLQKÅHV�RX�ÃQLEXV��UHVWDXUDQWHV�H�ODQFKRQHWHV��SRVWRV�SROLFLDLV�H�oVFDLV��HQWUH�RXWURV�

Page 2: Rodovias 2012

2 PESQUISA CNT DE RODOVIAS 2012P

RIN

CIP

AIS

DA

DO

S

CARACTERÍSTICAS PESQUISADAS

Característica Variáveis pesquisadas

Geometria da Via

Tipo de rodovia

3HUoO�GD�URGRYLD

)DL[D�DGLFLRQDO�GH�VXELGD�H�FRQGL·µR

2EUDV�GH�DUWH�H�FRQGL·µR

&XUYDV�SHULJRVDV�H�FRQGL·µR

Acostamento

Pavimento

&RQGL·µR�GH�VXSHUI¼FLH

9HORFLGDGH�GHYLGR�DR�SDYLPHQWR

Pavimento do acostamento

6LQDOL]D·µR

Faixas centrais

)DL[DV�ODWHUDLV

3ODFDV�GH�OLPLWH�GH�YHORFLGDGH

3ODFDV�GH�LQGLFD·µR

3ODFDV�GH�LQWHUVH·µR

'LVSRVLWLYRV�GH�SURWH·µR�FRQW¼QXD

9LVLELOLGDGHV�GDV�SODFDV

/HJLELOLGDGH�GDV�SODFDV

Grupo de variáveis de coleta por característica

,QGLFD·ÅHV�GD�3HVTXLVD([WHQVµR�7RWDO

km %

3DYLPHQWR�HP�HVWDGR�VDWLVIDWÁULR��ÁWLPR�H�ERP� 51.726 54,0

3DYLPHQWR�HP�HVWDGR�GHoFLHQWH��UHJXODU��UXLP�H�S¸VVLPR� 43.981 46,0

6LQDOL]D·µR�VDWLVIDWÁULD��ÁWLPR�H�ERP� 32.297 33,7

6LQDOL]D·µR�FRP�SUREOHPDV��UHJXODU��UXLP�H�S¸VVLPR� 63.410 66,3

3ODFDV�WRWDOPHQWH�FREHUWDV�SHOR�PDWR 20.279 21,2

([WHQVµR�FRP�DFRVWDPHQWR 58.013 60,6

3UHGRPLQ³QFLD�GH�SLVWD�VLPSOHV�GH�PµR�GXSOD 84.351 88,1

INDICAÇÕES GERAIS DA PESQUISA

Page 3: Rodovias 2012

3PESQUISA CNT DE RODOVIAS 2012

PR

INC

IPA

IS D

AD

OS

ABRANGÊNCIA

([WHQVµR�SHVTXLVDGD�SRU�WLSR�GH�JHVWµR�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������NP

*HVWµR�3ÆEOLFD 80.315

*HVWµR�&RQFHVVLRQDGD 15.392

TOTAL 95.707

([WHQVµR�WRWDO�SHVTXLVDGD�SRU�UHJLµR

5HJLµR km

Norte 10.393

Nordeste 26.739

Sudeste 27.187

6XO 16.842

Centro-Oeste 14.546

TOTAL 95.707

([WHQVµR�SHVTXLVDGD���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������NP

)HGHUDO 65.273

(VWDGXDO 30.434

TOTAL 95.707

Page 4: Rodovias 2012

4 PESQUISA CNT DE RODOVIAS 2012P

RIN

CIP

AIS

DA

DO

S

AVALIAÇÃO

ExTENSãO TOTAL DAS RODOVIAS PESQUISADAS

(VWDGR�*HUDO2011 2012

km % km %

Ótimo 11.743 12,7 9.454 9,9

Bom 27.778 30,0 26.200 27,4

5HJXODU 28.327 30,5 31.990 33,4

Ruim 16.751 18,1 19.412 20,3

3¸VVLPR 8.148 8,8 8.651 9,0

7RWDO 92.747 100,0 95.707 100,0

6LQDOL]D·µR2011 2012

km % km %

Ótimo 15.382 16,6 11.566 12,1

Bom 24.627 26,6 20.731 21,7

5HJXODU 26.576 28,7 29.180 30,5

Ruim 13.257 14,3 19.071 19,9

3¸VVLPR 12.905 13,9 15.159 15,8

7RWDO 92.747 100,0 95.707 100,0

Pavimento2011 2012

km % km %

Ótimo 43.233 46,6 46.890 49,0

Bom 5.035 5,4 4.836 5,1

5HJXODU 31.429 33,9 31.944 33,4

Ruim 10.432 11,2 8.272 8,6

3¸VVLPR 2.618 2,8 3.765 3,9

7RWDO 92.747 100,0 95.707 100,0

Page 5: Rodovias 2012

5PESQUISA CNT DE RODOVIAS 2012

PR

INC

IPA

IS D

AD

OS

(VWDGR�*HUDO2011 2012

km % km %

Ótimo 4.370 5,6 2.576 3,2

Bom 21.795 28,2 19.731 24,6

5HJXODU 26.480 34,2 30.218 31,6

Ruim 16.580 21,4 19.149 20,0

3¸VVLPR 8.148 10,5 8.641 9,0

7RWDO 77.373 100,0 80.315 100,0

(VWDGR�*HUDO2011 2012

km % km %

Ótimo 7.373 48,0 6.878 44,7

Bom 5.983 38,9 6.469 42,0

5HJXODU 1.847 12,0 1.772 11,5

Ruim 171 1,1 263 1,7

3¸VVLPR - - 10 0,1

7RWDO 15.374 100,0 15.392 100,0

Extensão Pública

Extensão Concedida

AVALIAÇÃO POR TIPO DE GESTÃO

Geometria da Via2011 2012

km % km %

Ótimo 3.895 4,2 3.878 4,1

Bom 17.660 19,0 17.716 18,5

5HJXODU 25.310 27,3 28.722 30,0

Ruim 16.158 17,4 15.509 16,2

3¸VVLPR 29.724 32,0 29.882 31,2

7RWDO 92.747 100,0 95.707 100,0

Page 6: Rodovias 2012

6 PESQUISA CNT DE RODOVIAS 2012P

RIN

CIP

AIS

DA

DO

S

PAVImENTO

;��������������NP��GD�H[WHQVµR�SHVTXLVDGD�DSUHVHQWD�DOJXP�WLSR�GH�SUREOHPD�

;��������������NP��GDV�URGRYLDV�VRE�FRQFHVVµR�IRUDP�FODVVLoFDGRV�FRPR�ÁWLPR�RX�ERP�

SINALIzAÇÃO

;��������������NP��GD�H[WHQVµR�SHVTXLVDGD�DSUHVHQWD�DOJXP�WLSR�GH�SUREOHPD�

;������ �������� NP�� GDV� URGRYLDV� VRE� JHVWµR� SÆEOLFD� SRVVXL� DOJXP� WLSR� GH�SUREOHPD�

;������ �������� NP�� GD� H[WHQVµR� SHVTXLVDGD� SRVVXL� SODFDV� WRWDOPHQWH� RX�SDUFLDOPHQWH�FREHUWDV�SHOR�PDWR�

;������ �������� NP�� GD� H[WHQVµR� SHVTXLVDGD� SRVVXL� SODFDV� GHVJDVWDGDV� RX�WRWDOPHQWH�LOHJ¼YHLV�

;������ �������� NP�� GD� H[WHQVµR� SHVTXLVDGD� QµR� SRVVXL� SODFDV� GH� OLPLWH� GH�YHORFLGDGH�

;��������������NP��GD�H[WHQVµR�SHVTXLVDGD�QµR�SRVVXL�SODFDV�GH�LQGLFD·µR�

GEOmETRIA DA VIA

;��������������NP��GD�H[WHQVµR�SHVTXLVDGD�¸�GH�SLVWD�VLPSOHV�GH�PµR�GXSOD�

;��������������NP��GD�H[WHQVµR�SHVTXLVDGD�QµR�SRVVXL�DFRVWDPHQWR��

PONTOS CRÍTICOS

;5HSUHVHQWDP�VLWXD·ÅHV�TXH�FRQoJXUDP�ULVFR�FRQVLGHU±YHO�RX�SRWHQFLDO�SDUD�RV�XVX±ULRV�GDV�URGRYLDV��FRPSURPHWHQGR�DV�FRQGL·ÅHV�GH�VHJXUDQ·D�QR�WU±IHJR�GH�YH¼FXORV�

;6µR� FRQVLGHUDGRV� SRQWRV� FU¼WLFRV�� EXUDFRV� JUDQGHV�� HURVµR� QD� SLVWD�� SRQWHV�FD¼GDV�H�TXHGDV�GH�EDUUHLUD�

;(P�������KRXYH�XP�DXPHQWR�QR�QÆPHUR�WRWDO�GH�SRQWRV�FU¼WLFRV�LGHQWLoFDGRV�QD�3HVTXLVD�&17�GH�5RGRYLDV��SDVVDQGR�GH�����RFRUUºQFLDV��HP�������SDUD�����

Page 7: Rodovias 2012

7PESQUISA CNT DE RODOVIAS 2012

PR

INC

IPA

IS D

AD

OS

CLASSIFICAÇÃO DO ESTADO GERAL (%) - POR REGIÃO E UF

Page 8: Rodovias 2012

8 PESQUISA CNT DE RODOVIAS 2012P

RIN

CIP

AIS

DA

DO

S

LIGAÇÕES RODOVIÁRIAS

;$�3HVTXLVD�&17�GH�5RGRYLDV�ID]�R�UDQNLQJ�GH�����OLJD·ÅHV�URGRYL±ULDV��6µR�WUHFKRV�UHJLRQDLV�TXH�LQWHUOLJDP�WHUULWÁULRV�GH�XPD�RX�PDLV�8QLGDGHV�GD�)HGHUD·µR�

;(VVDV� H[WHQVÅHV� WºP� LPSRUW³QFLD� VRFLRHFRQÃPLFD� H� YROXPH� VLJQLoFDWLYR� GH�WU±IHJR�GH�YH¼FXORV�GH�FDUJDV�H�RX�GH�SDVVDJHLURV�

10 melhores

3RVL·µR Nome Rodovias &ODVVLoFD·µR*HVWµR�

Concedida

1° 6µR�3DXOR�63���/LPHLUD�63 SP-310/BR-364, SP-348 ÁWLPR sim

2°6µR�3DXOR�63���,WD¼�63��� Espírito Santo do Turvo SP

SP-255, SP-280/BR-374 ÁWLPR sim

3° Bauru SP - Itirapina SP SP-225/BR-369 ÁWLPR sim

4° Barretos SP - Bueno de Andrade SP SP-326/BR-364 ÁWLPR sim

5° 5LEHLUµR�3UHWR�63���%RUERUHPD�63 SP-330/BR-050, SP-333 ÁWLPR sim

6°Limeira SP -

6µR�-RV¸�GR�5LR�3UHWR�63SP-310/BR-364, SP-310/

BR-456, SP-330/BR-050ÁWLPR sim

7° 6µR�3DXOR�63���8EHUDED�0* BR-050, SP-330/BR-050 ÁWLPR sim

8° 5LR�&ODUR�63���,WDSHWLQLQJD�63 SP-127, SP-127/BR-373 ÁWLPR sim

9°Catanduva SP - Taquaritinga SP -

5LEHLUµR�3UHWR�63

SP-322, SP-322/BR-265,

SP-323, SP-330/BR-050,

SP-351

ÁWLPR sim

10° 6µR�3DXOR�63���7DXEDW¸�63 SP-070 ÁWLPR sim

Page 9: Rodovias 2012

9PESQUISA CNT DE RODOVIAS 2012

PR

INC

IPA

IS D

AD

OS

INVESTImENTO Em INFRAESTRUTURA E ImPACTOS DAS CONDIÇÕES DAS RODOVIAS

���1(&(66,'$'(�'(�,19(67,0(172�3$5$�$�02'(51,=$¬à2�'$�,1)5$(6758785$�RODOVIáRIA NO BRASIL

;,QYHVWLPHQWR�WRWDO��5��������ELOKÅHV

;&RQVWUX·µR�GH�URGRYLD��5�������ELOKÅHV��������NP�

;'XSOLFD·µR�GH�URGRYLD��5�������ELOKÅHV���������NP�

;3DYLPHQWD·µR��5�������ELOKÅHV��������NP�

;5HFXSHUD·µR�GH�SDYLPHQWR��5�������ELOKÅHV���������NP�

;2XWUDV�LQWHUYHQ·ÅHV��5�������ELOKÅHV

10 Piores

3RVL·µR Nome Rodovias &ODVVLoFD·µR*HVWµR�

Concedida

100° 3RUWR�9HOKR�52���5LR�%UDQFR�$& BR-364 ruim QµR

101° -DWD¼�*2���3LUDQKDV�*2 BR-158 ruim QµR

102° 0DUDE±�3$���'RP�(OLVHX�3$ BR-222 ruim QµR

103°0DQDXV�$0���%RD�9LVWD�55���Pacaraíma RR

BR-174 ruim QµR

104° %DUUDFµR�35���&DVFDYHO�35BR-163, PR-163/BR-163, PR-182/

BR-163, PR-582/BR-163ruim QµR

105° $OWD�)ORUHVWD�07���&XLDE±�07 %5������%5������07���� ruim QµR

106° %UDV¼OLD�')���3DOPDV�72BR-010, DF-345/BR-010, GO-118,

GO-118/BR-010, TO-010, TO-050,

TO-050/BR-010, TO-342

ruim QµR

107° %HO¸P�3$���*XDUD¼�72BR-222, PA-150, PA-151, PA-252,

PA-287, PA-447, PA-475, PA-483,

TO-336

ruim QµR

108° Natividade TO - Barreiras BABA-460, BA-460/BR-242,

TO-040, TO-280ruim QµR

109° Rio Verde GO - Iporá GO GO-174 S¸VVLPR QµR

Page 10: Rodovias 2012

10 PESQUISA CNT DE RODOVIAS 2012P

RIN

CIP

AIS

DA

DO

S

2. CUSTO

;2�FXVWR�RSHUDFLRQDO�GRV�YH¼FXORV�¸� LPSDFWDGR�SHODV�FRQGL·ÅHV�GR�SDYLPHQWR��2�DFU¸VFLPR�P¸GLR�QR�FXVWR�RSHUDFLRQDO�GHYLGR�²V�DWXDLV�FRQGL·ÅHV�GD�PDOKD�URGRYL±ULD�EUDVLOHLUD�¸�GH�����

;5RGRYLDV�GHoFLHQWHV�DXPHQWDP�R�FXVWR�GH�PDQXWHQ·µR�GRV�YH¼FXORV�H�RV�JDVWRV�FRP�FRPEXVW¼YHO��OXEULoFDQWHV��IUHLRV�H�SQHXV�

;2� DXPHQWR� QR� FXVWR� GH� WUDQVSRUWH� HP� GHFRUUºQFLD� GD� P±� FRQVHUYD·µR� GDV�URGRYLDV�GLPLQXL�D�FRPSHWLWLYLGDGH�GRV�SURGXWRV�QDFLRQDLV��

3. COmBUSTÍVEL E mEIO AmBIENTE

;5RGRYLDV� TXH� DSUHVHQWDP� DOJXP� WLSR� GH� FRPSURPHWLPHQWR� GR� SDYLPHQWR�DXPHQWDP�R�FRQVXPR�GH�FRPEXVW¼YHO�H�FRQWULEXHP�SDUD�XPD�PDLRU�HPLVVµR�GH�SROXHQWHV�

;8PD� URGRYLD� HP� ERP� HVWDGR� GH� FRQVHUYD·µR� SRGH� UHVXOWDU� HP� DW¸� ��� GH�HFRQRPLD�QR�FRQVXPR�GH�FRPEXVW¼YHO�HP�UHOD·µR�D�XPD�URGRYLD�FRP�HVWDGR�GH�FRQVHUYD·µR�LQDGHTXDGR�

;6H�R�SDYLPHQWR�GH�WRGDV�DV�URGRYLDV�WLYHVVH�FODVVLoFD·µR�ERD�RX�ÁWLPD�HP�������VHULD�SRVV¼YHO�XPD�HFRQRPLD�GH�����PLOKÅHV�GH� OLWURV�GH�ÁOHR�GLHVHO��RX�VHMD�������5�������ELOKµR�H�XPD�UHGX·µR�GD�HPLVVµR�GH�����PHJDWRQHODGD�GH�&2

���SULQFLSDO�

J±V�GH�HIHLWR�HVWXID�

4. ACIDENTES

;(P������IRUDP�UHJLVWUDGRV�������PLO�DFLGHQWHV�QDV�URGRYLDV�IHGHUDLV�SROLFLDGDV��FHUFD�GH���PLO�DFLGHQWHV�D�PDLV�GR�TXH�HP������

;0DLV�GH����PLO�SHVVRDV� VRIUHUDP� OHVÅHV�JUDYHV�HP�DFLGHQWHV� URGRYL±ULRV�HP�������RXWUDV�����PLO�IRUDP�Y¼WLPDV�IDWDLV�

;2� FXVWR� FRP� DFLGHQWHV� HP� URGRYLDV� IHGHUDLV� IRL� GH� 5�� ����� ELOKÅHV� HP� ������'HVVHV��5������VµR�UHIHUHQWHV�D�DFLGHQWHV�FRP�Y¼WLPDV�IDWDLV�