563

REFERÊNCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS

Abell, S. (2000). From professor to colleague: Creating a professional identity

as collaborator in elementary science. Journal of Research in Science

Teaching, 37(6), 548-562.

Abell, S., & McDonald, J. (2006). Envisioning a curriculum of inquiry in the

elementary school. In L. Flick, & N. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry

and nature of science: Implications for teaching for teaching, learning,

and teacher education. Dordrecht: Springer.

Acevedo-Díaz, J. A. (2001). La formación del profesorado de enseñanza

secundaria para la educación CTS. Una questión problemática.

Recuperado em 2008, Julho 14, de <http:// www.campus-

oei.org/salactsi/ acevedo9>.

Adler, P., & Adler, P. (1994). Observational techniques. In N. Denzin, & Y.

Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage

Publications.

Afonso, N. (2005). Investigação naturalista em educação: Um guia prático e

crítico. Lisboa: ASA Editores.

Akmal, T., & Miller, D. (2003). Overcoming resistance to change: A case study

of revision and renewal in a US secondary education teacher preparation

program. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 409-420.

Alarcão, I. (1993). Formar-se para formar. Aprender, 15, 19-25.

Alarcão, I. (1996). Reflexão crítica sobre o pensamento de D. Schön e os

programas de formação de professores. In I. Alarcão (Ed.), Formação

reflexiva de professores: Estratégias de supervisão. Porto: Porto Editora.

Almeida, A. (2002). Educação em ciências e trabalho experimental: Emergência

de uma nova concepção. In ME (Eds.), (Re)pensar o ensino das ciências.

Lisboa: Ministério da Educação (DES).

Alonso, L. (2002). Integração currículo-avaliação: Que significados? Que

constrangimentos? Que implicações? In P. Abrantes, L. Alonso, M. Peralta,

L. Cortesão, C. Leite, J. Pacheco, F. Fernandes, & L. Santos (Eds.),

564

Avaliação das aprendizagens. Das concepções às práticas. Lisboa:

Ministério da Educação (DEB).

Anderson, C. (2007). Perspectives on science learning. In S. Abell, & N.

Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education. Mahwah:

Lawrence Erlbaum associates.

Anderson, L. (1989). Learners and learning. In M. Reynolds (Ed.), Knowledge

base for the beginning teacher. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.

Anderson, R. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about

inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1-12.

Ash, D., & Klein, C. (2000). Inquiry in the informal learning environment. In J.

Minstrell, & E. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiry into inquiry learning and teaching

in science. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of

Science

Aulls, M., & Shore, B. (2008). Inquiry in education: The conceptual foundations

for research as a curricular imperative. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum

associates.

Baptista, M., Freire, S., Reis, P., & Galvão, C. (2009). O envolvimento de

professores e alunos: Oportunidades criadas pelo PARSEL. Actas do XIII

Encontro Nacional de Educação em Ciências, Castelo Branco.

Baptista, M., & Freire, A. M. (2006). Investigações em aulas de Ciências Físico-

Químicas. Mudanças nas percepções de alunos do 8º ano relativamente ao

ensino e à avaliação. Investigar em Educação, 5, 237-257.

Barab, S. (2006). Design-based research: A methodological toolkit for the

learning scientist. In R. Sawyer (Ed.), The cambridge handbook for the

learning sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the

ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14.

Barak, M., & Shakhman, L. (2008). Reform-based science teaching: Teachers’

instructional practices and conceptions. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics,

Science & Technology Education, 4(1), 11-20.

565

Barbosa, V. (1991). Um contributo para o estudo da mudança na concepção do

ensino das ciências. Tese de mestrado não publicada, Universidade de

Lisboa, Departamento de Educação da Faculdade de Ciências, Lisboa.

Bardin, L. (2004). Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições 70 (Trabalho original

em francês publicado em 1977).

Bell, R., Smetana, L., & Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction:

Assessing the inquiry level of classroom activities. Science Teacher, 72(7),

30-33.

Berlak, A., & Berlak, H. (1981). Dilemmas of schooling: Teaching and social

change. New York, NY: Methuen & Co.

Bhattacharyya, S., Volk, T., & Lumpe, A. (2009). The influence of an extensive

inquiry-based field experience on pre-service elementary student

teachers’ science teaching beliefs. Journal of Science Teacher Education,

20, 199-218.

Boavida, A. M., & Ponte, J. P. (2002). Investigação colaborativa:

Potencialidades e problemas. In GTI (Ed.), Reflectir e investigar sobre a

prática profissional. Lisboa: APM.

Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (1994). Investigação qualitativa em educação: Uma

introdução à teoria e aos métodos. Porto: Porto Editora (Trabalho original

em inglês publicado em 1991).

Bolton, G. (2001). Reflective practice: Writing and professional development.

Thousand Oaks: Paul Chapman Publishing.

Boulton-Lewis, G., Smith, D., McCrindle, A., Burnett, P., & Campbell, K.

(2001). Secondary teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning.

Learning and Instruction, 11, 35-51.

Bracewell, R., Maistre, C., Lajoie, S., & Breuleux, A. (2008). The role of the

teacher in opening worlds of inquiry-drive learning with technology. In B.

Shore, M. Aulls, & M. Delcourt (Eds.), Inquiry in education: Overcoming

barriers to successful implementation. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum

associates.

566

Bramwell-Rejskind, F., Halliday, F., & McBride, J. (2008). Creating change:

Teachers’ reflections on introducing inquiry. In B. Shore, M. Aulls, & M.

Delcourt (Eds.), Inquiry in education: Overcoming barriers to successful

implementation. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum associates.

Brown, A., & Dowling, P. (1998). Doing research/reading research: A mode of

interrogation for education. London: Falmer Press.

Brown, J. (2004). Making the most of understanding by design. Washington,

DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Brown, S., & Melear, C. (2006). Investigation of secondary teachers’ beliefs and

practices after authentic inquiry-based experiences. Journal of Research

in Science Teaching, 43(9), 938-962.

Brunheira, L., & Fonseca, H. (1996). Investigar na aula de matemática. In P.

Abrantes, L. C. Leal, & J. P. Ponte (Eds.), Investigar para aprender

matemática. Lisboa: Projecto MPT e APM.

Bryan, L. (2003). Nestedness of beliefs: Examining a prospective elementary

teacher’s belief system about science teaching and learning. Journal of

Research in Science Teaching, 40(9), 835-868.

Burns, R. B. (2000). Introduction to research: Methods. London: SAGE.

Butler, D., Lauscher, H., Jarvis-Selinger, S., & Beckingham, B. (2004).

Collaboration and self-regulation in teachers’ professional development.

Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 435-455.

Bybee, R. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy. From purposes to practices.

Portsmouth, NH: Teachers College Press.

Bybee, R. (2000). Teaching science as inquiry. In J. Minstrell, & E. van Zee

(Eds.), Inquiry into inquiry learning and teaching in science. Washington,

DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Bybee, R. (2006). Scientific inquiry and science teaching. In L. Flick, & N.

Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science: Implications for

teaching for teaching, learning, and teacher education. Dordrecht:

Springer.

567

Bybee, R., & DeBoer, G. (1994). Research on goal for the science curriculum. In

D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning.

New York: Macmillan.

Bybee, R., Taylor, J., Gardner, A., Scotter, P., Powell, J., Westbrook, A., &

Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins, effectiveness

and applications. Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS. Recuperado em 2007, Julho

15, de < http://www.bscs.org/pdf/bscs5eexecsummary.pdf>.

Cachapuz, A. (2000). Perspectivas de ensino. Textos de apoio, nº 1. Porto:

Centro de estudos de educação em ciência.

Cachapuz, A., Praia, J., & Jorge, M. (2002). Ciência, educação em ciência e

ensino das ciências. Lisboa: Ministério da Educação.

Cachapuz, A., Praia, J., Gil Pérez, D., Carrascosa, J., & Martínez-Terrades, I.

(2001). A emergência da didáctica das ciências como campo específico do

conhecimento. Revista Portuguesa de Educação, 14(1), 155-195.

Calderhead, J. (1995). Teacher as clinicians. In L. Anderson (Ed.), International

Encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education. Oxford, UK: Elsevier

Science.

Calderhead, J., & Shorrock, S. B. (1997). Understanding teacher education.

Case studies in the professional development of beginning teachers.

London: Falmer Press.

Cañal, P. (2007). La investigación escolar, hoy. Didáctica de las Ciencias

Experimentales, 52, 9-19.

Cardoso, A. M., Peixoto, A. M., Serrano, M. C., & Moreira, P. (1996). O

movimento da autonomia do aluno: Estratégias a nível da supervisão. In I.

Alarcão (Org.), Formação reflexiva de professores: Estratégias de

supervisão. Porto: Porto Editora.

Carlson, L., Humphrey, G., & Reinhardt, K. (2003). Weaving science inquiry and

continuous assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Charlier, E. (2001). Formar professores profissionais para uma formação

contínua articulada à prática. In P. Perrenoud, L. Paquay, M. Altet, & E.

568

Charlier, Formando professores profissionais. Quais as estratégias? Quais

as competências? São Paulo: Artmed.

Cheng, M., Chan, K., Tang, S., & Cheng, A. (2009). Pre-service teacher

education students’ epistemological beliefs and their conceptions of

teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 319–327

Chval, K., Abell, S., Pareja, E., Musikul, K., & Ritza, G. (2008). Science and

mathematics teacher’s experiences, needs and expectations regarding

professional development. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science &

Technology Education, 4(1), 31-43.

Clement, M., & Vandenberghe, R. (2000). Teachers' professional development:

A solitary or collegial (ad)venture? Teaching and Teacher Education, 16,

81-101.

Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. (2005). Studying teacher education: The

report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. Mahwah,

NJ: AERA & Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1994). Research methods in education. London:

Routledge.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education.

London and New York: Routledge Falmer.

Collins, A. (1992). Towards a design science of education. In E. Scanlon, & T.

O'Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology. Berlin: Springer.

Correia, J., Caramelo, J., & Vaz, H. (1998). Formação de professores. In A.

Silva, L. Rothes, J. Correia, J. Caramelo, H. Vaz, N. Costa, & J. Praia

(Eds.), A evolução do sistema educativo e o PRODEP. Lisboa: Ministério da

Educação.

Costa, N., Marques, L., & Kempa, R. (2000). Science teachers’ awareness of

findings from education research. Research in Science & Technological

Education, 18(1), 37-44.

Crawford, B. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science

teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916-937.

569

Crawford, B. (2007). Learning to teach as inquiry in the rough and tumble of

practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 613-642.

Da-Silva, C., Mellado, V., Ruiz, C., & Porlán, R. (2007). Evolution of the

conceptions of a secondary education biology teacher: Longitudinal

analysis using cognitive maps. Science Teacher Education, 91, 461-491.

Day, C. (2001). Desenvolvimento profissional de professores: Os desafios da

aprendizagem permanente. Porto: Porto Editora (Trabalho original em

inglês publicado em 1999).

DBR (Design-Based Research Collective) (2003). Design-based research: An

emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher,

32(1), 5-8.

DeBoer, G. (2006). Historical perspectives on inquiry teaching in school. In L.

Flick, & N. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science:

Implications for teaching for teaching, learning, and teacher education.

Dordrecht: Springer.

Decreto-Lei nº 139-A/90, de 28 de Abril. D.R. I Série.

Decreto-Lei nº 207/96, de 2 de Novembro. D.R. I Série.

Decreto-Lei nº 249/92, de 9 de Novembro, D.R. I Série.

Decreto-Lei nº 344/89, de 11 de Outubro. D.R. I Série.

Denzin, N. K. (1998). The art and politics of interpretation. In N. Denzin, & Y.

Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials.

Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998). Introduction: Entering the field of

qualitative research. In N. Denzin, & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and

interpreting qualitative materials. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Dewey, J. (1998). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective

thinking to the educative process. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin (Trabalho

original publicado em 1933).

Duschl, R., & Grandy, R. (2008). Reconsidering the character and role of

inquiry school science: Farming the debates. In R. Duschl, & R. Grandy

570

(Eds.), Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and

implementation. Rotterdam: Sense publishers.

Erault, M. (1997). Strategies for developing teacher development. British

Journal of In-Service Education, 4(1/2), 10-12.

Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C.

Wittroch (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. New York, NY:

Macmillan.

Erickson, G., Brandes, G., Mitchell, I., & Mitchell, J. (2005). Collaborative

teacher learning: Findings from two professional development projects.

Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 787-798.

Ermeling, B. (2009, in press). Tracing the effects of teacher inquiry on

classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education.

Ernest, P. (1996). Investigações, resolução de problemas e pedagogia. In P.

Abrantes, L. Cunha Leal, & J. P. Ponte (Eds.), Investigar para aprender

matemática. Lisboa: Projecto matemática para todos e associação de

professores de matemática.

Estrela, M. (2001). Realidades e perspectivas da formação contínua de

professores. Revista Portuguesa de Educação, 14(1), 27-48.

Etherington, K. (2004). Becoming a reflexive researcher: Using our selves in

research. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Fazio, X., & Melville, W. (2008). Science teacher development through

collaborative action research. Teacher Development, 12(3), 193-209.

Feiman-Nemser, S. (1990). Teacher preparation: Structural and conceptual

alternatives. In R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher

education. New York: Macmillan.

Feldman, A. (2000). Decision making in the practical domain: A model of

practical conceptual change. Science Education, 84, 606-623.

Fetters, M., Czerniak, C., Fish, L., & Shawberry, J. (2002). Confronting,

challenging and changing teachers’ beliefs: Implications from a local

systemic change professional development program. Journal of Science

Teacher Education, 13(2), 101-130.

571

Filck, U. (2005). Métodos qualitativos na investigação científica. Lisboa:

Monitor.

Finley, F. N., & Pocoví, M. C. (2000). Considering the scientific method of

inquiry. In J. Minstrell, & E. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiry into inquiry learning

and teaching in science. Washington, DC: American Association for the

Advancement of Science.

Flores, M. (2003). Dilemas e desafios na formação de professores. In M. Moraes,

J. Pacheco, & M. Evangelista (Eds.), Formação de professores.

Perspectivas educacionais e curriculares. Porto: Porto Editora.

Flores, M., Simão, A., Rajala, R., & Tornberg, A. (2009). Possibilidades e

desafios da aprendizagem no contexto de trabalho: Um estudo

internacional. In M. Flores, & A. Simão (Org.), Aprendizagem e

desenvolvimento profissional de professores: Contextos e perspectivas.

Mangualde: Edições Pedago.

Fontana, A., & Frey, J. (1998). Interviewing: The art of science. In N. Denzin, &

Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials.

Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Freedman, R., & Salmon, S. (2001). The dialectic nature of research

collaborations: The relational literacy curriculum. In R. Ravid, & M. G.

Handler (Eds.), The many faces of school-university collaboration:

Characteristics of successful partnerships. Colorado, CO: Teacher Ideas

Press.

Freire, A. M. (1991). Contributo para uma tipologia de concepções de ensino de

física. Tese de mestrado não publicada, Universidade de Lisboa,

Departamento de Educação da Faculdade de Ciências, Lisboa.

Freire, A. M. (1993). Um olhar sobre o ensino da Física nos últimos cinquenta

anos. Revista de Educação, III(1), 37-49.

Freire, A. M. (1999). Aprender a ensinar nos estágios pedagógicos: Estudo sobre

mudanças nas concepções de ensino e na prática instrucional de

estagiários de Física e Química. Tese de doutoramento não publicada,

572

Universidade de Lisboa, Departamento de Educação da Faculdade de

Ciências, Lisboa.

Freire, A. M. (2004). Mudança de concepções de ensino dos professores num

processo de reforma curricular. In ME-DEB (Coord.), Flexibilidade

curricular, cidadania e comunicação. Lisboa: DEB.

Freire, A. M. (2009). Reformas curriculares em ciências e o ensino por

investigação. Actas do XIII Encontro Nacional de Educação em Ciências,

Castelo Branco.

Freire, A. M., Baptista, M., Cruz, M. N., & Vilela, C. (2008). Professores

europeus de ciências: Conhecimento científico, competências linguísticas

e meios digitais - CD do Professor (Projecto PEC. Projecto financiado pela

Comissão Europeia 226641-CP-1-2005- ES-COMENIUS-C21), [CD-Rom].

Universidade de Lisboa.

Fullan, M. (1991). The new meanings of educational change. New York:

Teachers College Press.

Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (1992). Teacher development and educational

change. In M. Fullan, & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teacher development and

educational Change. London: Falmer Press.

Galvão, C. (1993). Profissão: Professor. Concepção e expectativas de futuros

professores. Revista de Educação, 3(2), 47-57.

Galvão, C. (Coord.), Neves, A., Freire, A. M., Lopes, A. M., Santos, M. C.,

Vilela, M. C., Oliveira, M. T., & Pereira, M. (2002). Ciências Físicas e

Naturais. Orientações Curriculares para o 3º ciclo do ensino básico.

Lisboa: Ministério da Educação (DEB).

Galvão, C., Freire, A. M., Lopes, A. M., Neves, A., Oliveira, T., & Santos, C.

(2004). Inovação no currículo das ciências em Portugal: Algumas

perspectivas de avaliação. In ME-DEB (Coord), Flexibilidade curricular,

cidadania e comunicação. Lisboa: DEB.

Galvão, C., Reis, P., Freire, A. M., & Oliveira, T. (2006). Avaliação de

competências em ciências. Lisboa: Edições ASA.

573

García, C. (1999). Formação de professores. Para uma mudança educativa.

Porto: Porto Editora.

Gengarelly, L., & Abrams, E. (2009). Closing the gap: Inquiry in research and

the secondary science classroom. Journal of Science Education

Technology, 18, 74-84.

Glatthorn, A. (1995). Teacher development. In L. Anderson (Ed.), International

encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education. Oxford, UK: Elsevier

Science.

Gott, R., & Duggan, S. (1995). Investigative work in science curriculum.

Buckingham: Open University Press, UK.

Guba, E. (1990). The paradigm dialog. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In

N. Denzin, & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Newbury

Park, CA: Sage.

Guskey, T. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change.

Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5-12.

Guskey, T. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and

Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3/4), 381-391.

Habermas, J. (1990). Pensamento pós-metafísico: Estudos filosóficos. Rio de

Janeiro: Edições Tempo Brasileiro (Trabalho original publicado em alemão

em 1988).

Hargreaves, A. (1998). Os professores em tempos de mudança. Lisboa: McGraw-

Hill.

Hargreaves, A. (2001). The emotional geographies of teachers’ relations with

colleagues. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 503–527.

Hewson, P. (1992). Conceptual change in science teaching and teacher

education. Actas do National Center for Educational Research,

Documentation and Assessment, Madrid.

Hewson, P., & Hewson, M. A. (1987). Science teachers’ conceptions of

teaching: Implications for teaching education. International Journal

Science Education, 9(4), 425-440.

574

Hewson, P., Kerby, H., & Cook, P. (1995). Determining the conceptions of

teaching science held by experienced high school science teachers.

Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(5), 503-520.

Hoy, A., Davis, H., & Pape, S. (2006). Teacher knowledge and beliefs. In P.

Alexander, & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of education psychology.

Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Irez (2006). Are we prepared? An assessment of preservice science teacher

educators’ beliefs about nature of science. Science Teacher Education,

90, 1113-1143.

Janesick (1998). The dance of research design: Metaphor, methodolatry, and

meaning. In N. Denzin, & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative

inquiry. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Jarzabkowski, L. (1999). Commitment and compliance. Curious bedfellows in

teacher collaboration. Comunicação apresentada no Australian Association

for Research in Education and New Zealand Association for Research in

Education joint Conference. Recuperado em 2008, Dezembro 10, de

<http://www.aare.edu.au/99pap/jar99227.htm>.

John-Steiner, V., Weber, R., & Minnis, M. (1998). The challenge of studying

collaboration. American Educational Research Journal, 35(4), 773-783.

Jones, S., & Carter, G. (2007). Science teacher attitudes and beliefs. In S.

Abell, & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education.

Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Juuti, K., & Lavonen, J. (2006). Design-based research in science education:

one step towards methodology. Nordina, 4, 54-67.

Kagan, D. (1992). Professional growth among beginning and pre-service

teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62, 129-169.

Kang, N., & Wallace, C. (2004). Secondary science teachers’ use of laboratory

activities: Linking epistemological beliefs, goals, and practices. Science

Teacher Education, 89, 140-165.

575

Keys, C. & Kennedy, V. (1999). Understanding inquiry science teaching context:

A case study of an elementary teacher. Journal of Science Teacher

Education, 10(4), 315-333.

Kind, V., & Tamir, K. (2005). Science: Teaching school subjects 11-19. New

York, NY: Routledge.

Koballa, T., Glynn, S., & Upson, L. (2005). Conceptions of teaching science

held by novice teachers in an alternative certification program. Journal of

Science Teacher Education, 16, 287-308.

Korthagen, F. (2001). A reflection on reflection. In F. Korthagen, J. Kessels, B.

Koster, B. Lagerwerf, & T. Wubbels (Eds.), Linking practice and theory:

The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Korthagen, F. (2009). A prática, a teoria e a pessoa na aprendizagem

profissional ao longo da vida. In M. Flores, & A. Simão (Org.),

Aprendizagem e desenvolvimento profissional de professores: Contextos e

perspectivas. Mangualde: Edições pedago.

Korthagen, F., & Wubbels, T. (2001). Characteristics of reflective teachers. In

F. Korthagen, J. Kessels, B. Koster, B. Lagerwerf, & T. Wubbels (Eds.),

Linking practice and theory: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education.

Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Lam, B., & Kember, D. (2006). The relationship between conceptions of

teaching and approaches to teaching. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and

Practice, 12(6), 693-713.

Lei nº46/86, de 14 de Outubro (Lei de Bases do Sistema educativo Português).

D.R. I Série.

Leite, L. (2001). Contributos para uma utilização mais fundamentada do

trabalho laboratorial no ensino das ciências. In ME (Eds.), Cadernos

didácticos de ciências, 1. Lisboa: Ministério da Educação (DES).

Lerdeman, N. (2006). Sintax of nature of science within inquiry and science

instruction. In L. Flick, & N. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and

nature of science: Implications for teaching for teaching, learning, and

teacher education. Dordrecht: Springer.

576

Lessard-Hébert, M., Goyette, G., & Boutin, G. (1994). Investigação qualitativa:

Fundamentos e práticas. Lisboa: Instituto Piaget (Trabalho original

publicado em francês em 1990).

Levitt, K. (2001). An analysis of elementary teachers’ beliefs regarding the

teaching and learning of science. Science Education, 86, 1-22.

Liberman, A. (1994). Teacher development: Commitment and challenge. In P.

Grimmett, & J. Neufeld (Eds.), Teacher development and the struggle for

authenticity: Professional growth and restructuring in the context of

change. New York: Teachers College Press.

Lichtman, M. (2006). Qualitative research in education: A user's guide.

Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Lotter, C., Harwood, W., & Bonner, J. (2007). The influence of core teaching

conceptions on teachers’ use of inquiry teaching practices. Journal of

Science Teacher Education, 44(9), 1318-1347.

Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P., Love, N., & Stiles, K. (1998). Designing

professional development for teachers of science and mathematics.

Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. (2003).

Designing professional development for teachers of science and

mathematics. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2006). Understanding and developing

science teachers. Pedagogical content knowledge. Austrália: Sense

Publishers.

Lüdke, M., & André, M. (1986). Pesquisa em educação: Abordagens

qualitativas. São Paulo: EPU.

Luft, J. (2001). Changing inquiry practices and beliefs: The impact of an

inquiry-based professional development programme on beginning and

experienced secondary science teachers. International Journal of Science

Education, 23(5), 517-534.

577

Luft, J., & Roehring (2007). Capturing science teachers’ epistemological

beliefs: The development of the teacher beliefs interview. Electronic

Journal of Science Education, 11(2), 38-63.

Lumpe, A. (2007). Research-based professional development: Teachers engaged

in professional learning communities. Journal of Science Teacher

Education, 18, 125-128.

Lumpe, T., Haney, J., & Czerniak, M. (2000). Assessing teacher’ beliefs about

their science teaching context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,

37, 275-292.

Lunetta, V. (1998). The school science laboratory: Historical perspectives and

contexts for contemporary teaching. In Fraser, B., & Tobin, K. (Eds.),

International Handbook of Science Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer academic

publishers.

Maconi, L., Aulls, M., & Shore, B. (2008). Teachers’ use and understanding of

strategy in inquiry instruction. In B. Shore, M. Aulls, & M. Delcourt (Eds.),

Inquiry in education: Overcoming barriers to successful implementation.

New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum associates.

Madruga, J. (2002). Resolución de problemas. In F. Rodríguez (Ed.), La

resolución de problemas en matemáticas. Barcelona: Graó.

Magnusson, S., Palincsar, A., & Templin, M. (2006). Community, culture, and

conversation in inquiry-based instruction. In L. Flick, & N. Lederman

(Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science: Implications for teaching

for teaching, learning, and teacher education. Dordrecht: Springer.

Marques, M. (2004). Formação contínua de professores de ciências. Um

contributo para uma melhor planificação e desenvolvimento. Lisboa: ASA

Editores.

Martins, I. P. (2003). Literacia científica e contributos do ensino formal para a

compreensão pública da ciência. Aveiro: Universidade de Aveiro.

Martins, I. P., & Veiga, M. (1999). Uma análise do currículo da escolaridade

básica na perspectiva da educação em ciências. Lisboa: Instituto de

Inovação Educacional.

578

Maykut, P., & Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning qualitative research. A

philosophic and practical guide. London: Falmer Press.

McCotter, S. (2001). Collaborative groups as professional development.

Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 685–704.

Meirink, J., Meijer, P., Verloop, N., & Bergen, T. (2009). Understanding

teacher learning in secondary education: The relations of teacher

activities to changed beliefs about teaching and learning. Teaching and

Teacher Education, 25, 89-100.

Mellado, V. (1997a). The classroom practice of preservice teachers and their

conceptions of teaching and learning science. Science Teacher Education,

82, 197-214.

Mellado, V. (1997b). Preservice teachers’ classroom practice and their

conceptions of the nature of science. Science and Education, 6, 331-354.

Mellado, V. (2001). Por que a los profesores de ciências nos cuesta tanto

cambiar nuestras concepciones y modelos didácticos? Alambique, 40, 17-

30.

Mellado, V. (2003). Cambio didáctico del profesorado de ciências

experimentales y filosofia de la ciência. Enseñanza de las Ciências, 21(3),

343-358.

Menezes, L., & Ponte, J. (2009). Investigação colaborativa de professores e

ensino da matemática: Caminhos para o desenvolvimento profissional.

Jornal Internacional de Estudos em Educação Matemática, 1(1), 1-32.

Mevarech, Z. (1995). Teachers’ paths on the way to and from the professional

development forum. In T. Guskey, & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional

development in education. New paradigms & Practices. New York, NY:

Teachers college press.

Miguéns, M. (1999). O trabalho prático e o ensino das investigações na

educação básica. Lisboa: Conselho Nacional de Educação.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand

Oaks, CA: Sage.

579

Monk, M., & Dillon, J. (1995). Learning to teach science: Activities for

students, teachers and mentors. London: Falmer Press.

Moon, J. A. (1999). Reflection in learning & professional development: Theory

and Practice. Oxon, New York: Routledge Falmer.

Morse (1998). Designing funded qualitative research. In N. Denzin, & Y. Lincoln

(Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Publications.

Murphy, P., & Mason, L. (2006). Changing knowledge and beliefs. In P.

Alexander, & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of education psychology.

Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of

Curriculum Studies, 19, 317-328.

Newell, S. (1996). Practical inquiry: Collaboration and reflection in teacher

education reform. Teaching & Teacher Education, 12(6), 567-576.

NRC (National Research Council) (1996). National science education standards.

Washington, DC: National Academic Press.

NRC (National Research Council) (2000). Inquiry and the National Science

Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy.

NSTA (National Science Teachers Association) (2002). Science educator’s. guide

to laboratory assessment. Arlington: NTSA press.

Oliveira, H., Ponte, J. P., Santos, L., & Brunheira, L. (1999). Os professores e

as actividades de investigação. In P. Abrantes, J. P. Ponte, H. Fonseca, &

L. Brunheira (Eds.), Investigações matemáticas na aula e no currículo.

Lisboa: Projecto MPT e APM.

Oliveira, I., & Serrazina, L. (2002). A reflexão e o professor como investigador.

In GTI (Eds.), Reflectir e investigar sobre a prática profissional (pp. 29-

42). Lisboa: APM.

Oliver-Hoyo, M., Allen, D., & Anderson, M. (2004). Inquiry-guided instruction:

practical issues of implementation. Journal of College Science Teaching,

33(6), 20-24.

580

Osterman, K., & Kottkamp (2004). Reflective practice for educators.

Professional development to improve student learning. Thousand Oaks,

California: Corwin Press.

Pajares, M. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a

messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332.

Palincsar, A., & Ladewski, B. (2006). Literacy and the learning sciences. In R.

Sawyer (Ed.), The cambridge handbook for the learning sciences.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Paquay, L., & Wagner, M.C. (2001). Competências profissionais privilegiadas

nos estágios e na videogravação. In P. Perrenoud, L. Paquay, M. Altet, &

E. Charlier (Eds.), Formando professores profissionais. Quais as

estratégias? Quais as competências? São Paulo: Artmed.

Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Newbury

Park, CA: Sage.

Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury

Park, CA: Sage.

Penuel, W., Fishman, B., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. (2007). What makes

professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum

implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 921 –958.

Pérez, A. (1992). O pensamento prático do professor: A formação do professor

como profissional reflexivo. In A. Nóvoa (Ed.), Os professores e a sua

formação. Lisboa: Dom Quixote e IIE.

Pérez, D. (1993). Contribución de la história e de la filosofia de las ciencias al

desarrollo de un modelo de enseñanza/aprendizaje como investigación.

Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 11(2), 197-212.

Perrenoud, P. (1999). Formar professores em contextos sociais em mudança.

Prática reflexiva e participação crítica. Revista Brasileira de Educação,

12, 5-21.

Perrenoud, P. (2000). Construindo competências. Recuperado em 2005,

Outubro 8, de <http://www.unige.ch/ fapse/SSE/teachers/perrenoud/

php_main/ php_2000/2000_31.html>.

581

Perrenoud, P. (2002). A prática reflexiva no ofício do professor:

Profissionalização e razão pedagógica. Porto Alegre: Artmed.

Pollard, A. (2002). Reflective teaching: Effective and evidence-informed

professional practice. London: CONTINUUM.

Ponte, J. (1992). Concepções dos professores de matemática e processos de

formação. In M. Brown, D. Fernandes, J. Matos, & J. Ponte (Eds.),

Educação e matemática: Temas de investigação. Lisboa: IIE e Secção de

Educação e Matemática da SPCE.

Ponte, J. (1994). O desenvolvimento profissional do professor de matemática.

Educação Matemática, 31, 9-12 e 20.

Ponte, J. (1996). Perspectivas de desenvolvimento profissional de professores

de Matemática. In J. Ponte, C. Monteiro, M. Maia, L. Serrazina, & C.

Loureiro (Eds.), Desenvolvimento profissional de professores de

matemática: Que formação? Lisboa: SPCE.

Ponte, J. (1998). Da formação ao desenvolvimento profissional. In APM (Ed.),

Actas do ProfMat 98. Lisboa: APM.

Ponte, J. (2004). Pesquisar para compreender e transformar a nossa própria

prática. In GTI (Ed.), Reflectir e investigar sobre a prática profissional.

Lisboa: APM.

Ponte, J. P., Ferreira, C., Varandas, J., Brunheira, L., & Oliveira, H. (1999). A

relação professor-aluno na realização de investigações matemáticas.

Lisboa: Projecto MPT e APM.

Ponte, J. P., Oliveira, H., Cunha, M. H., & Segurado, I. (1998). Histórias de

investigações matemáticas. Lisboa: IIE.

Porlán, R. (1993). Constructivismo y Escuela. Hacia un modelo de enseñanza

aprendizaje basado en la investigación. Sevilla: Díada.

Prawat, R. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning: A

constructivist perspective. American Journal of Education, 100(3), 354-

395.

Ricoeur, P. (1987). Teoria da interpretação. Lisboa: Edições 70 (Trabalho

original publicado em inglês em 1976).

582

Roberts, D. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. Abell, & N.

Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education. Mahwah:

Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Roldão, M. C. (1998). Formação de professores: Da qualidade dos modelos aos

modelos para a qualidade. Aprender, 21(11), 46-50.

Rosa, M., & Arnoldi, M. (2006). A entrevista na pesquisa qualitativa:

Mecanismos para validação dos resultados. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica.

Sadalla, A., & Sá-Chaves, I. (2008). Constituição da reflexividade docente:

Indícios de desenvolvimento profissional colectivo. Educação Temática

Digital, 9(2), 189-203. Recuperado em 2008, Julho 14, de

<http://www2.uel.br/ceca/mestredu/Documentos/texto_eventos_realiza

dos_uel_1.pdf>

Sanches, M. (1997). Para um ensino de qualidade: Perspectiva organizacional.

Revista de Inovação, 10(1), 165-194.

Saraiva, M., & Ponte, J. (2003). O trabalho colaborativo e o desenvolvimento

profissional do professor de matemática. Quadrante, 12, 25-52.

Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practioner: Toward a new design for

teaching and learning in the professions. São Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Schön, D. (1991). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in

action. Aldershot Hants: Avebury.

Schön, D. (1992). Formar professores como profissionais reflexivos. In A. Nóvoa

(Ed.), Os professores e a sua formação. Lisboa: Dom Quixote.

Schwab, J. (1978). Education and the structure of the disciplines. In I.

Westbury, & N. J. Wilkof (Eds.), Science, curriculum and liberal

education. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Schwartz, R., & Crawford, B. (2006). Authentic scientific inquiry as context for

teaching nature of science: Identifying critical elements for success. . In

L. Flick, & N. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science:

Implications for teaching for teaching, learning, and teacher education.

Dordrecht: Springer.

583

Silva, A. (2002). Formação contínua de professores, construção de identidade e

desenvolvimento profissional. In A. Moreira & E. Macedo (Orgs.),

Currículo, práticas pedagógicas e identidades. Porto: Porto Editora.

Silva, J. (2003). A formação contínua de professores. Contradições de um

modelo. In M. Moraes, J. Pacheco, & M. Evangelista, Formação de

professores. Perspectivas educacionais e curriculares. Porto: Porto

Editora.

Silver, E. (1996). Acerca da formulação de problemas de matemática. In P.

Abrantes, L. C. Leal, & J. P. Ponte (Eds.), Investigar para aprender

matemática. Lisboa: Projecto MPT e APM.

Silverman, D. (2001a). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing

talk, text and interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Silverman, D. (2001b). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook.

Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Smith, M., & Siegel, H. (2004). Knowing, believing and understanding: The

goals of science education? Science Education, 13, 553-582.

Solomon, J. (1998). Avaliação do trabalho experimental dos alunos no ensino

das ciências. Actas do 2º Fórum Ciência Viva, Open University, Faculty of

Science. Recuperado em 2005, Julho 25, de

<http://www.cienciaviva.pt/forum/2forum/actas/2forumactasconferenci

a.pdf>

Solomon, J., Duveen, J., Scott, L., & Hall, S. (2000). Science through Sc1

investigations: Teaching, learning and assessing as you go. Hatfield: The

association for science education.

Songer, N., Lee, H., & Kam, R. (2002). Technology-rich inquiry science in urban

classrooms: What are the barriers to inquiry pedagogy? Journal of

Research in Science Teaching, 39(2), 128-150.

Sparks, D, & Loucks-Horsley, S. (1990). Models of staff development. In W.

Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education. New York:

MacMillan Pub.

584

Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Cognitive psychology. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace

College Publishers.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J., (1998). Basic of qualitative research. Techniques and

procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Publications.

Tamir, P. (2004). Science Education. Have enquiry-oriented science curricula

failed? In B. Moon, M. Ben-Peretz, & S. Brown (Eds.), Routhledge

international companion to education. New York, NY: Routhledge.

Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research. Analysis types and software tools.

Hampshire: Falmer Press.

Thompson, A. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the

research. In D. Grows (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics

teaching and learning. New York, NY: Macmillan.

Tillema, H., & Knol, W. (1997). Promoting student teacher learning through

conceptual change or direct instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education,

13, 579–595.

Tippins, D., Tobin, K., & Hook, K. (1993). Dealing with dilemmas of laboratory

science: Making sense of safety from constructivist perspective.

International Journal of Science Education, 15(1), 45-59.

Tsai, C. (2002). Nested epistemologies: Science teachers’ beliefs of teaching,

learning and science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(8),

771-783.

Tuckman, B. (2005). Manual de investigação em educação. Lisboa: Fundação

Calouste Gulbenkian (Trabalho original publicado em inglês em 1994).

Valente, M. O. (1978). Projecto de Física. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste

Gulbenkian.

Valente, M. O. (1988). Inovação e metodologia do ensino. Revista de Inovação,

1(1), 23-24.

Valente, M. O. (1997). O trabalho de laboratório. Limites e potencialidades.

Uma perspectiva histórica. Gazeta de Física, 1, 33-34.

585

Valente, M. O. (2002). Literacia e educação científica. Encontro na

Universidade de Évora, Évora.

van Manen, M. (1977). Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical.

Curriculum Inquiry, 6(3), 205-228.

van Zee, E., Lay, D., & Roberts, D. (2003). Fostering collaborative inquiries by

prospective and practicing elementary and middle school teachers.

Science Teacher Education, 87, 588-612.

Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2004). Using design-based research in design and

research of technology-enhanced learning environments. Actas do

encontro anual American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.

Watson, R. (2000). The role of practical work. In M. Monk, & J. Osborne (Eds.),

Good practice in science teaching: What research has to say. Buckingham,

PA: Open University Press.

Watson, R., & Fairbrolher, B. (1993). Open/ended work in science project:

Managing investigations in the laboratory. School Science Review, 75, 31-

38.

Watson, R., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1998). Learning to invest. In M. Ratcliffe

(Ed.), ASE guide to secondary science. Hatfield and Cheltenham: The

Association for Science Education and Stanley Thornes (Publishers) LTD.

Wee, B., Shepardson, D., Fast, J., & Harbor, J. (2007). Teaching and learning

about inquiry: Insights and challenges in professional development.

Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 63-89.

Wellington (2000). Teaching and learning secondary science: Contemporary

issues and practical approaches. London and New York: Routledge.

Wengraf, T. (2001). Qualitative research interviewing: Biographic narrative

and semi-structured methods. London: SAGE.

Wilder, M., & Shuttleworth, P. (2005). Cell inquiry: A 5E learning cycle lesson.

Science Activities: Classroom projects and curriculum ideas, 41(4), 37-43.

Wolcott, H. F. (2001). Writing up qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA:

Sage Publications.

586

Woolnough, B. (2000). Appropriate practical work for school science: Making it

practical and making it science. In J. Minstrell, & E. van Zee, (Eds.),

Inquiry into inquiry learning and teaching in science. Washington, DC:

American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Yin, R. K. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA:

Sage Publications.

Yoon, H., & Kim, M. (2009, in press). Collaborative reflection through dilemma

cases of science practical work during practicum. International Journal of

Science Education.

Zeichner, K. (1993). A formação reflexiva de professores: Ideias e práticas.

Lisboa: Educa.

Zeichner, K., & Liston, D. (1996). Reflective teaching: An introduction.

Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Zembal-Saul, C., Munford, D., Crawford, B., Friedrichsen, P., & Land, S.

(2002). Scaffolding preservice science teachers’ evidence-based

arguments during an investigation of natural selection. Research in

Science Education, 32, 437–463.